ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Candidate Evaluation Model×Feeling Thermometer Analysis×
领域政治心理学政治心理学
方法族Latent structureProcess / pipeline
起源年份19951964
提出者Milton Lodge, Marco Steenbergen & Donald KinderAmerican National Election Studies / Aage Clausen
类型Latent evaluation modelAffect rating instrument
开创性文献Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 309-326. DOI ↗Wilcox, C., Sigelman, L., & Cook, E. (1989). Some like it hot: Individual differences in responses to group feeling thermometers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(2), 246-257. DOI ↗
别名Impression-Driven Evaluation Model, Online Processing Model, Candidate Trait Evaluation ModelFeeling Thermometer, Affect Thermometer, Thermometer Rating Scale
相关44
摘要A candidate evaluation model represents how voters form overall assessments of political candidates as a latent function of perceived traits (competence, leadership, integrity, empathy), partisanship, issue proximity, and affect. It spans the trait-based factor models of Kinder et al. (1980) and the online-processing tally model of Lodge, Steenbergen and Brau (1995), which describes evaluation as a running summary updated as information arrives.The feeling thermometer is a survey instrument that asks respondents to rate their warmth or favorability toward a person, group, or institution on a 0-to-100 scale, where 0 is very cold/unfavorable, 100 is very warm/favorable, and 50 is neutral. Introduced in the American National Election Studies in the 1960s, it is the standard measure of political affect, and its analysis underpins candidate evaluation, group affect, and affective-polarization research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Candidate Evaluation Model · Feeling Thermometer Analysis. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare