ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

副产品技术DEA×数据包络分析(CCR模型)用于基于效率的排序×网络数据包络分析 (Network DEA)×
领域决策决策效率分析
方法族MCDMMCDMRegression model
起源年份200519782000
提出者Färe, Grosskopf, Noh et al.Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E.Färe & Grosskopf
类型Non-parametric efficiency with undesirable outputs and by-productsNon-parametric efficiency frontier (CCR model)Multi-stage nonparametric efficiency model
开创性文献Scheel, H. (2001). Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 400-410. DOI ↗Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34(1), 35–49. DOI ↗
别名By-Production DEA, Joint Production DEANetwork Data Envelopment Analysis, Network Efficiency Analysis, Multi-Stage DEA, Ağ Veri Zarflama Analizi
相关202
摘要By-Production Technology DEA is a variant of Data Envelopment Analysis designed for production systems that generate both desirable outputs and undesirable by-products or emissions. Rather than ignoring or arbitrarily penalizing undesirable outputs, this method explicitly models them as joint products of the production process. It evaluates efficiency while accounting for the trade-off between desired production and environmental impact.DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis (CCR model) for efficiency-based ranking) is a dea multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E. in 1978. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.Network Data Envelopment Analysis (Network DEA) is a nonparametric efficiency measurement framework introduced by Färe and Grosskopf (2000) that extends classical DEA to multi-stage or multi-division production processes. Rather than treating a decision-making unit as a black box, it explicitly models the internal structure — the divisions and the intermediate products that flow between them — enabling stage-level and overall efficiency scores to be estimated simultaneously within a single coherent model.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: By-Production Technology DEA · DEA · Network DEA. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare