ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Blockmodeling×Dyadic Analysis×
领域SociologySociology
方法族Process / pipelineRegression model
起源年份19761981
提出者Harrison White, Scott Boorman & Ronald BreigerHolland & Leinhardt (p1); Kenny (Social Relations Model)
类型Network partitioning into positions and a reduced role structureAnalysis of the dyad as the unit, decomposing relational effects
开创性文献White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 730–780. DOI ↗Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(373), 33–50. DOI ↗
别名block modeling, blockmodel analysis, generalized blockmodeling, CONCORdyad analysis, dyadic data analysis, social relations model, dyad census
相关44
摘要Blockmodeling is a family of methods that simplify a social network by partitioning its actors into positions — groups of actors who are equivalent in their pattern of ties — and summarizing the relations between positions as a compact image, or reduced role structure. Introduced by Harrison White, Scott Boorman, and Ronald Breiger in 1976, it shifts attention from individuals to the structural roles they occupy.Dyadic analysis treats the dyad — the pair of actors and the relation between them — as the unit of analysis, separating the relational outcome into what each actor brings to all their relationships and what is unique to the specific pair. It spans the descriptive dyad census of network analysis and statistical frameworks such as Holland and Leinhardt's p1 model and Kenny's Social Relations Model, all of which respect the structural non-independence inherent in relational data.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Blockmodeling · Dyadic Analysis. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare