方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 分块随机对照试验× | 整群随机对照试验× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 实验设计 | 实验设计 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1920s (Fisher's blocking principle); applied to RCTs from the 1940s onward | 1978–1980s |
| 提出者≠ | R. A. Fisher (blocking principle); systematic RCT application by Bradford Hill and later Pocock, Friedman et al. | Cornfield (1978); systematised by Donner and colleagues (1980s) |
| 类型 | Experimental design | Experimental design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2010). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (4th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-1441915856 | Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold. ISBN: 978-0340652978 |
| 别名 | blocked RCT, block-randomized trial, stratified block randomization trial, permuted block randomization | cluster RCT, group-randomized trial, community randomized trial, cluster-randomized experiment |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | A blocked randomized controlled trial (blocked RCT) uses permuted-block randomization to ensure that treatment groups remain balanced in size — and optionally in key characteristics — throughout recruitment. Within each block of fixed or randomly varied size, all treatment allocations are present in equal numbers, so imbalance cannot accumulate even if the trial is stopped early. This makes blocked RCTs the standard randomization approach in clinical and behavioral intervention research. | A cluster randomized controlled trial (cluster RCT) is an experimental design in which intact social or organisational groups — such as schools, clinics, villages, or workplaces — are randomly assigned to treatment conditions rather than individual participants. Outcomes are still measured at the individual level, but the unit of randomization is the cluster. This design is essential when an intervention is delivered to whole groups, when there is a risk of contamination between participants in the same setting, or when individual randomization is logistically or ethically impractical. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|