ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

受阻自然实验×分块随机对照试验×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Blocking: 1935; natural experiments as formal causal framework: 1990s–2000s1920s (Fisher's blocking principle); applied to RCTs from the 1940s onward
提出者Combines Fisher's blocking principle (1935) with natural experiment methodology formalized by Angrist and Pischke (2009)R. A. Fisher (blocking principle); systematic RCT application by Bradford Hill and later Pocock, Friedman et al.
类型Quasi-experimental causal designExperimental design
开创性文献Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2010). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (4th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-1441915856
别名stratified natural experiment, block-stratified quasi-experiment, natural experiment with blockingblocked RCT, block-randomized trial, stratified block randomization trial, permuted block randomization
相关35
摘要A blocked natural experiment is a quasi-experimental design that exploits naturally occurring, researcher-uncontrolled variation in treatment assignment while pre-stratifying (blocking) units on key observed covariates. Blocking absorbs between-stratum variance, improves statistical precision, and strengthens the plausibility of the as-if-random assumption within each block. The design draws on Fisher's blocking principle and the natural experiment tradition in economics and epidemiology.A blocked randomized controlled trial (blocked RCT) uses permuted-block randomization to ensure that treatment groups remain balanced in size — and optionally in key characteristics — throughout recruitment. Within each block of fixed or randomly varied size, all treatment allocations are present in equal numbers, so imbalance cannot accumulate even if the trial is stopped early. This makes blocked RCTs the standard randomization approach in clinical and behavioral intervention research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Blocked Natural Experiment · Blocked Randomized Controlled Trial. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare