方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Bland-Altman 方法一致性分析× | 等效性检验(TOST× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 统计学 | 统计学 |
| 方法族 | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| 起源年份≠ | 1986 | 1987 |
| 提出者≠ | J. Martin Bland & Douglas G. Altman | Donald J. Schuirmann |
| 类型≠ | Graphical and statistical method comparison | Parametric equivalence test |
| 开创性文献≠ | Bland, J.M. & Altman, D.G. (1986). Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310. DOI ↗ | Schuirmann, D.J. (1987). A Comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for Assessing the Equivalence of Average Bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15(6), 657–680. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Bland-Altman plot, limits of agreement analysis, method agreement analysis, Bland-Altman Uyum Analizi | TOST, two one-sided tests, bioequivalence test, Eşdeğerlik Testi (TOST — Two One-Sided Tests) |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | The Bland-Altman analysis is a graphical and statistical technique for assessing agreement between two measurement methods applied to the same subjects. Introduced by J. Martin Bland and Douglas G. Altman in their landmark 1986 Lancet paper, it plots the difference between the two methods against their mean for each subject, and derives the bias (mean difference) along with limits of agreement (LoA) that capture 95% of differences in the population. | The equivalence test using the Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure is a parametric hypothesis test designed to demonstrate that the difference between two group means falls within a pre-specified equivalence region ±Δ. Introduced by Schuirmann (1987) in the context of pharmaceutical bioequivalence, TOST reverses the logic of classical null-hypothesis testing: instead of trying to detect a difference, it provides positive evidence of similarity. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|