ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Bland-Altman 方法一致性分析×等效性检验(TOST×
领域统计学统计学
方法族Hypothesis testHypothesis test
起源年份19861987
提出者J. Martin Bland & Douglas G. AltmanDonald J. Schuirmann
类型Graphical and statistical method comparisonParametric equivalence test
开创性文献Bland, J.M. & Altman, D.G. (1986). Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310. DOI ↗Schuirmann, D.J. (1987). A Comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for Assessing the Equivalence of Average Bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15(6), 657–680. DOI ↗
别名Bland-Altman plot, limits of agreement analysis, method agreement analysis, Bland-Altman Uyum AnaliziTOST, two one-sided tests, bioequivalence test, Eşdeğerlik Testi (TOST — Two One-Sided Tests)
相关55
摘要The Bland-Altman analysis is a graphical and statistical technique for assessing agreement between two measurement methods applied to the same subjects. Introduced by J. Martin Bland and Douglas G. Altman in their landmark 1986 Lancet paper, it plots the difference between the two methods against their mean for each subject, and derives the bias (mean difference) along with limits of agreement (LoA) that capture 95% of differences in the population.The equivalence test using the Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure is a parametric hypothesis test designed to demonstrate that the difference between two group means falls within a pre-specified equivalence region ±Δ. Introduced by Schuirmann (1987) in the context of pharmaceutical bioequivalence, TOST reverses the logic of classical null-hypothesis testing: instead of trying to detect a difference, it provides positive evidence of similarity.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Bland-Altman Analysis · Equivalence Test (TOST). 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare