方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于bibliometrix的快速文献回顾× | 文献计量分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 科学计量学 | 科学计量学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2017 (bibliometrix); rapid review practice established ~2010s | 1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s |
| 提出者≠ | Aria & Cuccurullo (bibliometrix package); rapid review tradition from Cochrane and evidence synthesis community | Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934) |
| 类型≠ | Expedited evidence synthesis with computational bibliometric support | Quantitative literature analysis |
| 开创性文献≠ | Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. DOI ↗ | Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗ |
| 别名 | bibliometrix rapid review, R-based rapid review, rapid bibliometric review, tool-assisted rapid synthesis | bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | A bibliometrix-assisted rapid review combines the speed and pragmatic focus of a rapid review with the computational power of the bibliometrix R package. Researchers use bibliometrix to automate citation import, deduplication, descriptive statistics, and science-mapping tasks, compressing the bibliometric phase of a rapid review from days to hours while maintaining transparent, reproducible workflows within a single open-source environment. | Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|