方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 文献计量分析× | 综合评价× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 科学计量学 | 科学计量学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s | 2005 (updated methodology); roots in Cooper (1982) |
| 提出者≠ | Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934) | Robin Whittemore & Kathleen Knafl |
| 类型≠ | Quantitative literature analysis | Systematic review method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗ | Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis | integrative literature review, integrative research review, ILR, integrative synthesis |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline. | An integrative review is a systematic method for synthesising literature that allows the simultaneous inclusion of diverse study designs — experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental — as well as theoretical papers. Unlike the conventional systematic review, which is restricted to controlled trials or a single methodology, the integrative review builds a comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon by drawing on the full breadth of the relevant evidence base. The method follows a rigorous, structured pipeline to ensure transparency and minimise bias. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|