ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

EDAS的双极扩展×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20211995
提出者Jana, C., Pal, M.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Bipolar outranking/ranking — Bipolar Fuzzy Set (BFS: positive membership μ⁺ ∈ [0,1], negative μ⁻ ∈ [-1,0])Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Jana, C., Pal, M. (2021). Extended bipolar fuzzy EDAS approach for multi-criteria group decision-making process. Computational and Applied Mathematics DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要BF-EDAS (Bipolar extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Jana, C., Pal, M. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: BF-EDAS · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare