ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Benefit Incidence Analysis×Regulatory Impact Analysis×
领域Public PolicyPublic Policy
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20001995
提出者Public-finance and World Bank tradition; codified by Lionel DemeryGovernment regulatory-reform practice; standardised by the OECD
类型Distributional analysis of public expenditureSystematic ex-ante appraisal of proposed regulation
开创性文献Demery, L. (2000). Benefit Incidence: A Practitioner's Guide. Washington, DC: World Bank, Poverty and Social Development Group, Africa Region. link ↗OECD (2020). Regulatory Impact Assessment, OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI ↗
别名BIA, Benefit Incidence, Expenditure Incidence AnalysisRIA, Regulatory Impact Assessment, Impact Assessment of Regulation
相关44
摘要Benefit incidence analysis (BIA) assesses how the benefits of public spending on services such as education, health and subsidies are distributed across population groups, typically ranked by income or consumption. It combines data on who uses publicly provided services, drawn from household surveys, with the unit cost or subsidy the government provides per user, to estimate how much of total public spending each group captures. The result reveals whether public expenditure is progressive — favouring the poor — or regressive, and is a standard tool for analysing the distributional fairness of fiscal policy.Regulatory impact analysis (RIA) is a systematic process for appraising the likely costs, benefits and effects of proposed regulation before it is adopted. Promoted by the OECD as a cornerstone of good regulatory governance, it requires governments to define the problem a regulation is meant to solve, set out alternative options including non-regulatory ones, assess the impacts of each against a do-nothing baseline, consult affected parties, and recommend the option that delivers the greatest net benefit. RIA aims to ensure that new rules are evidence-based, proportionate and justified rather than imposed without examination of their consequences.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Benefit Incidence Analysis · Regulatory Impact Analysis. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare