方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 贝叶斯 t 检验× | 贝叶斯方差分析 (Bayesian ANOVA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 贝叶斯 | 贝叶斯 |
| 方法族 | Bayesian methods | Bayesian methods |
| 起源年份≠ | 2009 | 2012 |
| 提出者≠ | Rouder, Speckman, Sun, Morey & Iverson | Rouder, Morey, Speckman & Province |
| 类型≠ | Bayesian hypothesis test | Bayesian hypothesis test / group comparison |
| 开创性文献≠ | Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D. & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t Tests for Accepting and Rejecting the Null Hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. DOI ↗ | Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L. & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes Factors for ANOVA Designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356–374. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | bayesian two-sample t-test, bayes factor t-test, Bayesçi t-Testi | bayesian analysis of variance, bayes factor ANOVA, JZS ANOVA, Bayesçi ANOVA — Bayes Faktörü ile Grup Karşılaştırması |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Bayesian t-test, formalised by Rouder and colleagues in 2009, is a two-group comparison method that works within a Bayesian framework. Instead of a p-value, it produces a Bayes Factor (BF₁₀) that quantifies the evidence the data provide for the alternative hypothesis relative to the null, and it reports the full posterior distribution of the standardised effect size δ with a highest-density interval. | Bayesian ANOVA, formalised by Rouder, Morey, Speckman and Province (2012), tests whether group means differ by quantifying the evidence for the alternative hypothesis relative to the null using the Bayes Factor (BF₁₀). Unlike classical ANOVA, it can also measure evidence in favour of the null hypothesis, making it equally informative when groups do not differ. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|