ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

贝叶斯倾向得分加权×Marginal Structural Model (MSM)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份20092000
提出者McCandless, Gustafson & AustinJames M. Robins, Miguel A. Hernan, Babette Brumback
类型Bayesian causal weighting estimatorCausal model / semiparametric weighting
开创性文献McCandless, L. C., Gustafson, P., & Austin, P. C. (2009). Bayesian propensity score analysis for observational data. Statistics in Medicine, 28(1), 94–112. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
别名Bayesian PSW, Bayesian IPW, Bayesian inverse probability weighting, Bayesian propensity weightingMSM, MSM-IPTW, marginal structural Cox model, weighted structural model
相关65
摘要Bayesian Propensity Score Weighting estimates causal treatment effects in observational data by combining a Bayesian model for the propensity score with inverse probability weighting. By placing a prior over propensity-score parameters and propagating posterior uncertainty through the weighting step, this approach yields fully probabilistic uncertainty intervals for the average treatment effect, accounting for the uncertainty in both the score model and the outcome.A marginal structural model is a causal modeling framework designed to estimate the effect of a time-varying treatment in the presence of time-varying confounders that are themselves affected by prior treatment. By reweighting observations with inverse probability of treatment weights, MSMs create a pseudo-population in which confounding is eliminated, enabling unbiased estimation of causal treatment contrasts even when standard regression adjustments would fail.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Bayesian Propensity Score Weighting · Marginal Structural Model. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare