ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

贝叶斯倾向得分匹配×贝叶斯双重差分法×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份20122015-2023
提出者Kaplan & Chen (2012); foundational PSM by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)Li & Marchand (formal Bayesian DiD framework); Brodersen et al. (Bayesian causal inference in time series)
类型Bayesian causal inference / matchingBayesian causal inference / panel regression
开创性文献Kaplan, D., & Chen, J. (2012). A Two-Step Bayesian Approach for Propensity Score Analysis: Simulations and Case Study. Psychometrika, 77(3), 581-609. DOI ↗Li, F., & Marchand, J. (2023). Bayesian inference for difference-in-differences. Econometrics Journal, 26(3), 509-529. link ↗
别名Bayesian PSM, BPSM, Bayesian matching estimator, Bayesian propensity weightingBayesian DiD, Bayes DiD, Bayesian diff-in-diff, Bayesian panel causal estimator
相关65
摘要Bayesian Propensity Score Matching (Bayesian PSM) extends classical propensity score matching by placing a prior distribution over the propensity model parameters and propagating posterior uncertainty through the matching and outcome stages. Introduced formally by Kaplan and Chen (2012), it offers a principled account of estimation uncertainty that frequentist matching commonly ignores, and allows incorporation of substantive prior knowledge about treatment selection.Bayesian Difference-in-Differences applies Bayesian statistical inference to the classic DiD design, replacing frequentist point estimates with full posterior distributions over the treatment effect. This yields not only an estimate of the causal effect but also a coherent probability statement about its magnitude and uncertainty, making it especially useful when sample sizes are modest or informative prior knowledge is available.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Bayesian Propensity Score Matching · Bayesian Difference-in-Differences. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare