ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

贝叶斯 Phillips-Perron 单位根检验×贝叶斯增广迪基-富勒单位根检验×
领域计量经济学计量经济学
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1988 / early 1990s1991–1992
提出者Phillips & Perron (classical test, 1988); Bayesian framework: Sims & Uhlig (1991)Sims & Uhlig (1991); Koop, Osiewalski & Steel (1992)
类型Unit root test (Bayesian)Bayesian hypothesis test
开创性文献Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346. DOI ↗Sims, C. A., & Uhlig, H. (1991). Understanding unit rooters: A helicopter tour. Econometrica, 59(6), 1591–1599. DOI ↗
别名Bayesian PP test, Bayesian Phillips-Perron test, Bayesian nonparametric unit root test, Bayes PP unit rootBayesian ADF test, Bayesian unit root test, Bayesian Dickey-Fuller, BADF
相关56
摘要The Bayesian Phillips-Perron unit root test combines the nonparametric long-run variance correction of the classical Phillips-Perron test with a Bayesian inferential framework. Instead of a p-value, it yields a posterior probability or Bayes factor quantifying evidence for or against a unit root, allowing researchers to incorporate prior economic knowledge and obtain probability statements directly about the persistence of a time series.The Bayesian Augmented Dickey-Fuller (BADF) unit root test re-frames the classical ADF test within a Bayesian framework. Rather than computing a frequentist p-value, it quantifies evidence for or against a unit root by comparing posterior probabilities or Bayes factors under the null (unit root) and alternative (stationarity) hypotheses, incorporating prior beliefs about the autoregressive parameter.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Bayesian PP unit root test · Bayesian ADF unit root test. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare