方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 贝叶斯判别效度评估× | 验证性因子分析（CFA）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 2020 (Bayesian HTMT formalization); 1959 (discriminant validity concept) | 1969 |
| 提出者≠ | Adaptation of Campbell & Fiske (1959) discriminant validity into Bayesian CFA framework; Bayesian HTMT formalization by Garnier-Villarreal & Jorgensen (2020) | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| 类型≠ | Validity assessment | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| 开创性文献≠ | Garnier-Villarreal, M. & Jorgensen, T. D. (2020). Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood. Psychological Methods, 25(1), 46–70. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Bayesian HTMT, Bayesian HTMTb, Bayesian discriminant evidence, Bayesian CFA discriminant validity | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Bayesian discriminant validity assessment evaluates whether two theoretically distinct latent constructs are empirically separable, using posterior distributions and credible intervals rather than single-point null-hypothesis tests. It is applied within Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis or via the Bayesian heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMTb) to determine whether constructs measuring different traits are sufficiently differentiated. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|