ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

贝叶斯判别效度评估×贝叶斯验证性因子分析 (BCFA)×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份2020 (Bayesian HTMT formalization); 1959 (discriminant validity concept)2007–2012
提出者Adaptation of Campbell & Fiske (1959) discriminant validity into Bayesian CFA framework; Bayesian HTMT formalization by Garnier-Villarreal & Jorgensen (2020)Sik-Yum Lee; Bengt Muthén and Tihomir Asparouhov
类型Validity assessmentBayesian latent variable model
开创性文献Garnier-Villarreal, M. & Jorgensen, T. D. (2020). Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood. Psychological Methods, 25(1), 46–70. DOI ↗Lee, S.-Y. (2007). Structural Equation Modeling: A Bayesian Approach. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0470024232
别名Bayesian HTMT, Bayesian HTMTb, Bayesian discriminant evidence, Bayesian CFA discriminant validityBCFA, Bayesian CFA, Bayesian structural equation measurement model, Bayes-CFA
相关64
摘要Bayesian discriminant validity assessment evaluates whether two theoretically distinct latent constructs are empirically separable, using posterior distributions and credible intervals rather than single-point null-hypothesis tests. It is applied within Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis or via the Bayesian heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMTb) to determine whether constructs measuring different traits are sufficiently differentiated.Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis tests a pre-specified factor structure using Bayesian inference. Instead of point estimates with p-values, it produces full posterior distributions for loadings, factor correlations, and residual variances, allowing the researcher to incorporate prior knowledge and propagate parameter uncertainty naturally.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Bayesian Discriminant Validity · Bayesian Confirmatory Factor Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare