ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

贝叶斯双重差分法×因果影响分析×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份2015-20232015
提出者Li & Marchand (formal Bayesian DiD framework); Brodersen et al. (Bayesian causal inference in time series)Kay H. Brodersen, Fabian Gallusser, Jim Koehler, Nicolas Remy, Steven L. Scott (Google)
类型Bayesian causal inference / panel regressionBayesian causal inference / counterfactual forecasting
开创性文献Li, F., & Marchand, J. (2023). Bayesian inference for difference-in-differences. Econometrics Journal, 26(3), 509-529. link ↗Brodersen, K. H., Gallusser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N., & Scott, S. L. (2015). Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247-274. DOI ↗
别名Bayesian DiD, Bayes DiD, Bayesian diff-in-diff, Bayesian panel causal estimatorCausalImpact, BSTS causal inference, Bayesian causal impact, counterfactual time-series analysis
相关55
摘要Bayesian Difference-in-Differences applies Bayesian statistical inference to the classic DiD design, replacing frequentist point estimates with full posterior distributions over the treatment effect. This yields not only an estimate of the causal effect but also a coherent probability statement about its magnitude and uncertainty, making it especially useful when sample sizes are modest or informative prior knowledge is available.Causal Impact Analysis, introduced by Brodersen et al. (2015) at Google, uses Bayesian structural time-series models to estimate what would have happened to an outcome had an intervention never occurred. By constructing a probabilistic counterfactual from pre-treatment data and control covariates, it quantifies point-in-time and cumulative treatment effects with full posterior uncertainty intervals.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Bayesian Difference-in-Differences · Causal Impact Analysis. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare