方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 贝叶斯粗化精确匹配× | 贝叶斯倾向得分匹配× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 2011-2012 | 2012 |
| 提出者≠ | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM framework, 2012); Bayesian extensions by Hill and subsequent authors | Kaplan & Chen (2012); foundational PSM by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) |
| 类型≠ | Quasi-experimental matching with Bayesian inference | Bayesian causal inference / matching |
| 开创性文献≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Kaplan, D., & Chen, J. (2012). A Two-Step Bayesian Approach for Propensity Score Analysis: Simulations and Case Study. Psychometrika, 77(3), 581-609. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | Bayesian CEM, BCEM, Bayesian monotonic imbalance bounding matching | Bayesian PSM, BPSM, Bayesian matching estimator, Bayesian propensity weighting |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Bayesian Coarsened Exact Matching (Bayesian CEM) combines the coarsening-and-exact-matching framework of Iacus, King, and Porro with Bayesian posterior inference. Covariates are discretised into coarser bins so that treated and control units can be matched exactly within those bins, and Bayesian priors are then placed on the treatment-effect parameters to produce full posterior distributions over the causal estimand rather than a single point estimate. | Bayesian Propensity Score Matching (Bayesian PSM) extends classical propensity score matching by placing a prior distribution over the propensity model parameters and propagating posterior uncertainty through the matching and outcome stages. Introduced formally by Kaplan and Chen (2012), it offers a principled account of estimation uncertainty that frequentist matching commonly ignores, and allows incorporation of substantive prior knowledge about treatment selection. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|