ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

贝叶斯粗化精确匹配×贝叶斯倾向得分匹配×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份2011-20122012
提出者Iacus, King & Porro (CEM framework, 2012); Bayesian extensions by Hill and subsequent authorsKaplan & Chen (2012); foundational PSM by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)
类型Quasi-experimental matching with Bayesian inferenceBayesian causal inference / matching
开创性文献Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Kaplan, D., & Chen, J. (2012). A Two-Step Bayesian Approach for Propensity Score Analysis: Simulations and Case Study. Psychometrika, 77(3), 581-609. DOI ↗
别名Bayesian CEM, BCEM, Bayesian monotonic imbalance bounding matchingBayesian PSM, BPSM, Bayesian matching estimator, Bayesian propensity weighting
相关66
摘要Bayesian Coarsened Exact Matching (Bayesian CEM) combines the coarsening-and-exact-matching framework of Iacus, King, and Porro with Bayesian posterior inference. Covariates are discretised into coarser bins so that treated and control units can be matched exactly within those bins, and Bayesian priors are then placed on the treatment-effect parameters to produce full posterior distributions over the causal estimand rather than a single point estimate.Bayesian Propensity Score Matching (Bayesian PSM) extends classical propensity score matching by placing a prior distribution over the propensity model parameters and propagating posterior uncertainty through the matching and outcome stages. Introduced formally by Kaplan and Chen (2012), it offers a principled account of estimation uncertainty that frequentist matching commonly ignores, and allows incorporation of substantive prior knowledge about treatment selection.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Bayesian Coarsened Exact Matching · Bayesian Propensity Score Matching. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare