ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Authoritarian Dynamic Measurement×Need for Closure Scale×
领域政治心理学政治心理学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20051994
提出者Karen Stenner & Stanley FeldmanDonna M. Webster & Arie W. Kruglanski
类型Self-report predisposition measureSelf-report individual-difference scale
开创性文献Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521534789Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049-1062. DOI ↗
别名Child-Rearing Authoritarianism Scale, Stenner Authoritarianism Measure, Authoritarian Predisposition ScaleNFCS, Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, Webster-Kruglanski Scale
相关44
摘要The authoritarian-dynamic approach, developed by Stenner (2005) and Feldman (2003), measures authoritarianism as a latent predisposition toward favoring social conformity and order over individual autonomy and difference, typically assessed with four forced-choice child-rearing values items rather than attitude statements. Its distinctive claim is that intolerance is a dynamic product of this predisposition interacting with perceived normative threat.The Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, developed by Webster and Kruglanski (1994), measures a stable individual difference in the desire for a firm, definite answer to a question and an aversion to ambiguity and uncertainty. High need for closure is a key epistemic-motivation construct in political psychology, linked to conservatism, prejudice, intolerance of dissent, and resistance to belief change.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Authoritarian Dynamic Measurement · Need for Closure Scale. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare