方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 美国肩肘外科医师评分× | 全球变化评分量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 运动医学 | 运动医学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1994 | 1989 |
| 提出者≠ | American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Committee | Ruben Jaeschke, Jack Singer, Gordon H. Guyatt |
| 类型≠ | Patient self-report with clinician assessment components | Patient global perception |
| 开创性文献≠ | Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3(6):347-352. DOI ↗ | Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10(4):407-415. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | ASES, ASES Shoulder Score | GRC, Global Rating of Change |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Assessment Form is a hybrid outcome instrument combining patient self-report and clinician assessment to evaluate shoulder function and pain. Developed by the ASES Committee in 1994 and published in the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, the ASES Score has become the standard shoulder outcome measure in orthopedic and sports medicine settings, widely used in clinical trials, surgical registries, and longitudinal outcomes tracking. | The Global Rating of Change (GRC) Scale is a single-item, self-report outcome measure that asks patients to rate the overall change in their condition since baseline assessment. Developed by Jaeschke, Singer, and Guyatt in 1989 and published in Controlled Clinical Trials, the GRC Scale has become a fundamental method for anchor-based interpretation of change scores on clinical outcome measures, enabling clinicians and researchers to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in standardized scales. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|