ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

AROMAN(考虑双步归一化的排序顺序方法)×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20221995
提出者Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregationStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: AROMAN · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare