ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

AROMAN(考虑双步归一化的排序顺序方法)×CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20222025
提出者Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.
类型Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregationImpact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)
开创性文献Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: AROMAN · CIMAS. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare