方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 兽医麻醉风险评分× | 兽医临床评分系统× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 兽医学 | 兽医学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1941-present | 2000s |
| 提出者≠ | American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) | Veterinary Pain Society and AAFP |
| 类型≠ | Risk assessment and stratification | Assessment pipeline |
| 开创性文献≠ | American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) House of Delegates. (2020). ASA Physical Status Classification System. Retrieved from ASA official website: https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/asa-physical-status-classification-system link ↗ | Hansen, B. D., Lascelles, B. D., Keates, H., et al. (2015). Painful Osteoarthritis in Cats: Chronic Pain Assessment, Management, and Welfare Considerations. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 17(8), 637-646. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | surgical risk scoring, preoperative assessment, ASA scoring | clinical assessment scoring, veterinary patient scoring |
| 相关 | 3 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Anesthesia risk scoring is a systematic preoperative assessment method that stratifies patient risk based on medical history, physical findings, and health status. Adapted from the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification (developed for humans in 1941) and refined for veterinary species through confidential enquiry data and clinical research, it guides anesthetic technique selection, identifies high-risk patients requiring optimization, and predicts perioperative morbidity and mortality. | Clinical scoring systems provide standardized methods for objectively assessing animal health status, pain, disease severity, and treatment outcomes. Developed progressively by veterinary organizations and research groups since the early 2000s, these systems enable consistent documentation, comparison of cases, and evidence-based clinical decision-making across species and practice settings. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|