ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

审计中的分析程序×内部控制评价×
领域会计学会计学
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19831992
提出者American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)
类型Audit procedure methodologyComprehensive control evaluation framework
开创性文献American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal Control – Integrated Framework. COSO Publications. link ↗
别名Analytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend AnalysisCOSO Framework, Control Design Testing, Internal Control Assessment
相关44
摘要Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing.Internal Control Evaluation is a systematic methodology for assessing the design and effectiveness of an entity's internal control system using the COSO Integrated Framework. Developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, this approach evaluates five interrelated components—control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring—to determine whether controls are adequate to prevent and detect errors and fraud.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Analytical Procedures in Auditing · Internal Control Evaluation. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare