方法对比

	AHP-BOCR	最佳-最差法 (Best-Worst Method)	模糊层次分析法 (Fuzzy AHP)
领域	决策	决策	决策
方法族	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
起源年份	2008	2015	1983
提出者	Thomas L. Saaty (AHP); BOCR framework development extended AHP	Rezaei, J.	Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W.
类型	Hierarchical pairwise comparison with strategic perspective	Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP	Pairwise comparison with Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) judgments — umbrella over Van Laarhoven-Pedrycz 1983, Buckley 1985, Chang 1992 extent analysis, Cheng 1996 entropy-based
开创性文献	Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.	Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega	Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems
别名	AHP-BOCR, Strategic Criteria AHP	—	—
相关	5	8	8
摘要	AHP-BOCR is an extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process that incorporates strategic perspectives through the BOCR framework: Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. Instead of optimizing a single objective, AHP-BOCR decomposes decisions into four strategic dimensions and uses a formula (Benefits × Opportunities) / (Costs × Risks) to synthesize a strategic priority. This approach is particularly suited to long-term, complex decisions with multiple stakeholder perspectives.	BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	FUZZY-AHP (Fuzzy AHP — Fuzzy extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.