ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

层次分析法×综合基于距离的排序×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19802022
提出者Saaty, T. L.Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G. P., Tadić, S., Kovač, M., Miglietta, P. P.
类型Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)Distance from PIS/NIS/AS (Euclidean × Taxicab combined)
开创性文献Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G. P., Tadić, S., Kovač, M., Miglietta, P. P. (2022). A Novel Axiomatic DEA-COBRA Framework for Evaluating the Sustainable Performance of Agri-Food Systems. Sustainability link ↗
别名
相关88
摘要AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COBRA (COmprehensive distance Based RAnking) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G. P., Tadić, S., Kovač, M., Miglietta, P. P. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: AHP · COBRA. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare