ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Actor-Network Theory Analysis×Social Construction of Technology×
领域Science Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19841984
提出者Bruno Latour, Michel Callon, John LawTrevor Pinch & Wiebe Bijker
类型Material-semiotic theory and analytic methodConstructivist theory of technological development
开创性文献Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199256051Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. DOI ↗
别名ANT analysis, Sociology of translation, Actant-network mappingSCOT, Social constructivism of technology, Interpretive flexibility analysis
相关44
摘要Actor-Network Theory analysis treats society and technology as a single woven fabric, mapping how heterogeneous human and non-human actors—engineers, scallops, documents, machines, regulators—are linked into networks through a process of translation. Rather than explaining technical outcomes by appeal to pre-given social categories, ANT follows the actors themselves and describes how durable arrangements are assembled, stabilised, and sometimes undone.The Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a constructivist framework holding that technological artefacts are shaped by the interpretations and negotiations of relevant social groups rather than by technical logic alone. Introduced by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker in 1984, it shows that an artefact has 'interpretive flexibility'—different groups see different problems and solutions in it—until a process of closure stabilises one design as the obvious one.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Actor-Network Theory Analysis · Social Construction of Technology. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare