ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Acceptability Judgment Task×Grammaticality Judgment Task×
领域语言学语言学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19961965
提出者Experimental-syntax researchers (Jon Sprouse; Ellen Bard, Antonella Sorace)Noam Chomsky (generative-linguistics tradition)
类型Quantified rating of sentence well-formednessIntrospective elicitation of linguistic competence
开创性文献Sprouse, J., Schütze, C. T., & Almeida, D. (2013). A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua, 134, 219–248. DOI ↗Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262530071
别名Acceptability Judgement Task, AJT, Sentence Acceptability Rating, Experimental Syntax Judgment TaskGrammaticality Judgement Task, GJT, Sentence Grammaticality Judgment
相关33
摘要The acceptability judgment task is the modern, quantified successor to informal grammaticality judgments: instead of a single linguist marking a sentence grammatical or not, many participants rate carefully controlled sentences on a graded scale, and the ratings are analyzed statistically. Built on factorial designs with fillers and counterbalancing, and on response formats from Likert scales to magnitude estimation to forced choice, it turns intuition into replicable, gradient data. The approach anchors the experimental-syntax program associated with Jon Sprouse and colleagues, which tests grammatical hypotheses with the same methodological rigor as psycholinguistic experiments.The grammaticality judgment task asks speakers to decide whether a sentence is grammatical — well-formed according to the rules of their language — and treats that decision as evidence about the mental grammar that produces it. Rooted in Noam Chomsky's generative program, where the native speaker's intuition is the primary data of linguistics, the task ranges from a single linguist consulting their own intuitions to large controlled experiments with binary, scaled, or forced-choice responses. It is a workhorse of syntactic theory and of second-language acquisition research, where it probes what learners know about a target language beyond what they can produce.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Acceptability Judgment Task · Grammaticality Judgment Task. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare