So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thang đo bài ngoại× | Thang đo Giá trị Dân chủ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Xã hội học chính trị | Xã hội học chính trị |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2009–2016 | 1999–2015 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Alin Ceobanu, Xavier Escandell, Elke Schlueter | Russell Dalton, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Christian Welzel |
| Loại | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Ceobanu, A. M., & Escandell, X. (2010). Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: The European Social Survey. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(6), 953-969. link ↗ | Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | XS, Anti-Immigration Attitude Scale | DVS, Democratic Attitudes Scale |
| Liên quan≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The Xenophobia Scale measures fear, discomfort, or prejudice toward foreign nationals and immigrants. Unlike immigration policy preferences (which can reflect economic or pragmatic considerations), xenophobia captures affective and attitudinal dimensions—emotional threat perception, negative stereotypes, and cultural distance. Developed by migration scholars including Ceobanu and Escandell, it is essential for understanding antiforeign sentiment and discriminatory attitudes across diverse contexts. | The Democratic Values Scale measures commitment to core principles of democratic governance including free speech, rule of law, fair elections, protection of minorities, and transparent institutions. Rather than measuring support for democracy as a system (which is nearly universal in principle), it captures depth of commitment to democratic norms, tolerance for dissent, and willingness to protect rights of political opponents. Developed by comparative political scientists including Dalton, Klingemann, and Welzel, it reveals psychological foundations of democratic stability. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|