So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Tổng quan hệ thống× | Phân tích gộp× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Viết học thuật | Viết học thuật |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1992 | 1976 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Cochrane Collaboration (1992) | Glass (1976, term coining); Fisher and Pearson (statistical foundations) |
| Loại | Document Type | Document Type |
| Công trình gốc | Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ | Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | systematic literature review, evidence synthesis, scoping review, mapping review | quantitative synthesis, meta-synthesis, pooled analysis, statistical integration |
| Liên quan≠ | 3 | 2 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | A systematic review is a structured, transparent synthesis of all available evidence addressing a specific research question. Unlike narrative reviews, systematic reviews employ comprehensive database searches, predefined selection criteria, quality assessment, and rigorous reporting (PRISMA guideline). The Cochrane Collaboration (founded 1992) established this methodology as the gold standard for evidence synthesis in healthcare and social sciences. | Meta-analysis is the statistical pooling of quantitative findings from multiple independent studies to produce a combined effect estimate. By aggregating data across studies, meta-analysis increases statistical power, reduces random error, and provides a precise summary of an intervention's effectiveness or an association's magnitude. Gene V. Glass coined the term in 1976, formalizing a technique that has become indispensable for evidence synthesis in medicine, psychology, education, and other evidence-based disciplines. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|