ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Thí nghiệm tự nhiên mù đơn×Thí nghiệm tự nhiên×
Lĩnh vựcThiết kế thí nghiệmThiết kế thí nghiệm
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đờiLate 20th century (formalized practice)1990s (formal methodological articulation); earlier in epidemiology (John Snow, 1854)
Người khởi xướngConceptual synthesis of natural experiment tradition (Haavelmo, 1944; Campbell & Stanley, 1963) with single-blind methodologyVaried; systematized in econometrics and political science (e.g., Meyer 1995; Angrist & Krueger 1991)
LoạiQuasi-experimental design with partial blindingQuasi-experimental research design
Công trình gốcDunning, T. (2012). Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-1107698000Meyer, B. D. (1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13(2), 151–161. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácsingle-masked natural experiment, blinded quasi-experiment, single-blind exogenous assignment studynatural quasi-experiment, naturally occurring experiment, exogenous shock design, as-if randomization
Liên quan23
Tóm tắtA single-blind natural experiment leverages an exogenous, researcher-uncontrolled event — such as a policy change, lottery, or natural disaster — to create treatment and comparison groups, while applying single-blind procedures so that either the participants or the outcome assessors (but not both) are unaware of group assignment. This design combines the causal leverage of natural variation with reduced measurement bias from blinding.A natural experiment exploits a real-world event, policy, or circumstance that assigns individuals to treatment and control conditions in a way that is plausibly random — or at least exogenous to the outcome of interest. Because the researcher does not control assignment, it occupies a middle ground between a true randomized controlled trial and purely observational research, offering stronger causal leverage than conventional observational designs when the as-if randomization assumption holds.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Single-blind Natural Experiment · Natural Experiment. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare