ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Tự đạo văn và Tái chế văn bản×Tương đồng so với Đạo văn: Hiểu rõ sự khác biệt×Đạo văn nguyên văn×
Lĩnh vựcĐạo đức nghiên cứuĐạo đức nghiên cứuĐạo đức nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1990s2000s1950s
Người khởi xướngInternational Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)Academic integrity frameworks and plagiarism detection software companiesAcademic integrity framework (modern definition)
LoạiConceptConceptConcept
Công trình gốcRoig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. link ↗Hirsch, L. R. (2013). Recognizing plagiarism: A guide for academic professionals. Teaching Professor Blog. link ↗Council of Canadian Academies (2019). The state of science and technology in Canada. Ottawa: Council of Canadian Academies. link ↗
Tên gọi kháctext recycling, self-copying, duplicate publication, redundant publicationsimilarity index, turnitin score, similarity percentagedirect plagiarism, copy-and-paste plagiarism, literal copying
Liên quan244
Tóm tắtSelf-plagiarism, or text recycling, occurs when an author reuses substantial portions of their own previously published work in a new publication without disclosure or acknowledgment. This includes republishing the same article in different venues, duplicating methods sections across multiple papers, or reusing discussion sections. While the intellectual property is the author's own, self-plagiarism is considered misconduct because it violates the principle that published work represents new research and it may inflate publication counts.A critical distinction exists between similarity percentages generated by plagiarism detection software (Turnitin, iThenticate) and an actual plagiarism verdict. A similarity index is a red flag requiring review; it is not a plagiarism determination. High similarity can result from legitimate quotations, references, shared technical language, or common knowledge. Conversely, low similarity does not guarantee absence of plagiarism. Human expert judgment is essential—similarity detection software provides data, not judgment.Verbatim plagiarism is the most straightforward and recognizable form of academic misconduct: copying text word-for-word from a source without quotation marks, citation, or attribution. It is the most easily detected form of plagiarism and carries severe institutional and career consequences.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Self-Plagiarism and Text Recycling · Similarity vs Plagiarism: Understanding the Distinction · Verbatim Plagiarism. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-20 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare