So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Tương đồng so với Đạo văn: Hiểu rõ sự khác biệt× | Đạo văn nguyên văn× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Đạo đức nghiên cứu | Đạo đức nghiên cứu |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2000s | 1950s |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Academic integrity frameworks and plagiarism detection software companies | Academic integrity framework (modern definition) |
| Loại | Concept | Concept |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Hirsch, L. R. (2013). Recognizing plagiarism: A guide for academic professionals. Teaching Professor Blog. link ↗ | Council of Canadian Academies (2019). The state of science and technology in Canada. Ottawa: Council of Canadian Academies. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | similarity index, turnitin score, similarity percentage | direct plagiarism, copy-and-paste plagiarism, literal copying |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | A critical distinction exists between similarity percentages generated by plagiarism detection software (Turnitin, iThenticate) and an actual plagiarism verdict. A similarity index is a red flag requiring review; it is not a plagiarism determination. High similarity can result from legitimate quotations, references, shared technical language, or common knowledge. Conversely, low similarity does not guarantee absence of plagiarism. Human expert judgment is essential—similarity detection software provides data, not judgment. | Verbatim plagiarism is the most straightforward and recognizable form of academic misconduct: copying text word-for-word from a source without quotation marks, citation, or attribution. It is the most easily detected form of plagiarism and carries severe institutional and career consequences. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|