So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Độ bão hòa dữ liệu trong nghiên cứu định tính× | Phương pháp nhóm tập trung× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Nghiên cứu định tính | Nghiên cứu định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1967 | 1956 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss | Robert K. Merton and Paul F. Lazarsfeld |
| Loại≠ | Concept | Method |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302560 | Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803954366 |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | saturation, theoretical saturation, thematic saturation, sampling to saturation | FGD, focus group discussion, group interview |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Data saturation is a foundational principle in qualitative research describing the point at which data collection yields no new themes, codes, or insights—additional data becomes redundant. Introduced by Glaser and Strauss (1967) in their work on grounded theory, saturation guides decisions about sample size and when to stop recruiting participants. Saturation is not a fixed number but a dynamic endpoint determined by examining whether new data are adding substantively new information. The concept is central to claims of rigor and theoretical adequacy in qualitative research, signaling that the researcher has gathered sufficient data to understand the phenomenon in depth. | Focus group discussions are a qualitative research method in which a trained moderator guides a small group (typically 6–12 participants) through structured or semi-structured discussion of a specific topic or product. Developed by Merton and Lazarsfeld in the 1950s for market research, focus groups are now widely used in health sciences, education, social sciences, and policy research. The method leverages group interaction to generate rich, contextual insights that individual interviews may not reveal. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|