So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phương pháp Không gian Luật× | Kiểm tra Thích ứng Máy tính Chẩn đoán Nhận thức× | Mô hình DINA× | Mô hình DINO× | Phân tích Định tính So sánh Mờ (Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis)× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Trắc lượng tâm lý |
| Họ | Latent structure | Latent structure | Latent structure | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1983 | 2007 | 2001 | 2006 | 2000 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Kikumi K. Tatsuoka | Xueli Xu, Jean-Paul Fox | Brian Junker, Klaas Sijtsma | James Templin, Russell Henson | Charles Ragin |
| Loại≠ | IRT-based diagnostic classification | Skill-adaptive testing with psychometric diagnostic classification | Discrete latent class model | Disjunctive latent class model | Set-theoretic configurational method |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Hartz, S. M. (2002). A Bayesian framework for the unified treatment of assessing dimensionality, assessing local dependence, and estimating ability for unidimensional and multidimensional item response data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. link ↗ | Choi, K. M., Lee, Y. S., & Park, Y. S. (2015). What CDM can tell about examinees' strengths and weaknesses: Cognitive diagnostic information in TIMSS. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Policy Analysis, 24(1), 79-100. link ↗ | Junker, B. W., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(3), 258-272. DOI ↗ | Templin, J., & Henson, R. A. (2006). Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models. Psychological Methods, 11(3), 287-305. DOI ↗ | Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. University of Chicago Press. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | RSM | CD-CAT | DINA | DINO | fsQCA, FSQCA |
| Liên quan≠ | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Rule Space Methodology (RSM) is a diagnostic classification approach developed by Tatsuoka (1983) that uses Item Response Theory and geometric methods to classify examinees into knowledge states based on their response patterns. Unlike classical scoring, RSM identifies which specific skills or competencies an examinee possesses or lacks, enabling targeted educational interventions. | Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing (CD-CAT) combines computerized adaptive testing (CAT) with cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) to efficiently assess students' specific skill profiles. Rather than producing a single overall ability score, CD-CAT adaptively selects items to quickly identify which skills a student has mastered and which need development. | The DINA Model (Deterministic Inputs, Noisy Outputs) is a cognitive diagnostic model developed by Junker and Sijtsma (2001) that classifies examinees into latent skill classes based on their item response patterns. DINA assumes a deterministic relationship between skill mastery and correct responses, with probabilistic error accounting for guessing and slips. | The DINO Model (Deterministic Inputs, Noisy Outputs—Disjunctive) is a cognitive diagnostic model that relaxes DINA's conjunctive (AND) skill requirement logic. DINO assumes an examinee only needs to master one of multiple possible skill pathways to answer an item correctly, making it suitable for scenarios where skills are substitutable or alternative routes to success exist. | Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) is a set-theoretic method developed by Charles Ragin in the early 2000s that combines the configurational logic of qualitative case studies with the mathematical rigor of fuzzy sets. It bridges qualitative and quantitative research by allowing researchers to examine causal complexity through combinations of conditions (configurations) rather than isolated variables. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|
|
|
|