ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Robust Propensity Score Matching×Trọng số điểm xu hướng (PSW / IPW)×
Lĩnh vựcSuy luận nhân quảSuy luận nhân quả
HọRegression modelRegression model
Năm ra đời2016 (robust variance correction); 1983 (PSM foundations)1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Người khởi xướngAbadie & Imbens (2016) for matching-on-estimated-propensity-score with corrected variance; Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) for PSM foundationsRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
LoạiQuasi-experimental matching estimator with robust inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
Công trình gốcAbadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2016). Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781-807. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácrobust PSM, PSM with robust variance, bias-corrected PSM, matching with robust inferencePSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Liên quan66
Tóm tắtRobust Propensity Score Matching (robust PSM) is a quasi-experimental causal inference method that pairs treated and control units on their estimated probability of receiving treatment (the propensity score), then estimates the average treatment effect using variance estimators that account for the uncertainty introduced by estimating the propensity score itself. The correction, developed by Abadie and Imbens (2016), prevents misleading inference that standard bootstrap or analytic formulas produce when applied naively after matching.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Robust Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare