ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Phân tích Rủi ro Cạnh tranh Điều chỉnh Rủi ro×Ghép cặp điểm xu hướng×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcThống kê nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1999 (subdistribution hazard model); cause-specific hazard framework earlier1983
Người khởi xướngJason Fine and Robert GrayPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
LoạiRegression model for time-to-event data with competing eventsMethod
Công trình gốcFine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Tên gọi kháccompeting risks regression, subdistribution hazard model, cause-specific hazard analysis, Fine-Gray modelPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Liên quan43
Tóm tắtRisk-adjusted competing risks analysis extends classical survival analysis to settings where subjects can experience more than one type of terminal event, and where the occurrence of one event prevents the occurrence of another. By modelling cause-specific or subdistribution hazards while adjusting for measured confounders, the method yields unbiased estimates of the absolute probability — the cumulative incidence function — of each event type over time in the presence of competing events.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Risk-adjusted competing risks analysis · Propensity Score Matching. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare