ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Nghiên cứu Bằng chứng Thực tế×Thiết kế nghiên cứu đoàn hệ×
Lĩnh vựcNghiên cứu lâm sàngNghiên cứu lâm sàng
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời2010s-present1970s-1980s
Người khởi xướngFDA, EMA, and health agencies; Sherman et al. (2016) defined RWE formallyDonald Acheson, Olli Miettinen, and others in modern epidemiology
LoạiResearch DesignResearch Design
Công trình gốcSherman, R. E., Anderson, S. A., Dal Pan, G. J., Gray, G. W., Gross, T., Hunter, N. L., ... & Califf, R. M. (2016). Real-world evidence—what is it and what can it tell us? New England Journal of Medicine, 375(23), 2293–2297. DOI ↗Miettinen, O. S. (1976). Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 103(2), 226–235. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácreal-world evidence, RWE, RWD, effectiveness researchprospective study, follow-up study, longitudinal study, cohort study
Liên quan32
Tóm tắtReal-World Evidence (RWE) is clinical evidence derived from Real-World Data (RWD)—data routinely collected in clinical practice from electronic health records, insurance claims, patient registries, and other healthcare sources. Formalized by the FDA in 2016 (Sherman et al.), RWE addresses a critical gap: while randomized trials test drugs under ideal conditions, RWE evaluates how treatments actually work in diverse, real patients with comorbidities, competing medications, and varied adherence. RWE complements (not replaces) trial evidence, accelerating regulatory decision-making and supporting post-market surveillance.A cohort study follows a group of individuals forward in time from exposure to outcome. Exposed and unexposed participants (or participants with differing exposure levels) are enrolled at baseline, characterized, and observed prospectively until the outcome occurs or the study ends. Cohort studies are fundamental to epidemiology and are the design of choice for establishing causal associations when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Real-World Evidence Studies · Cohort Study Design. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare