So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Khung RE-AIM× | Lý thuyết Quy trình Chuẩn hóa (NPT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Khoa học triển khai | Khoa học triển khai |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1999 | 2006 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., and colleagues | May, C. R. |
| Loại | Framework | Framework |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1322-1327. DOI ↗ | May, C. R. (2006). A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 86. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | RE-AIM, REAIM, Glasgow framework | NPT, normalization theory, routinization |
| Liên quan | 5 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) is a five-dimension evaluation tool designed to assess the public health impact of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings. Developed by Glasgow et al. (1999) to address the gap between efficacy trials (controlled conditions) and effectiveness in practice, RE-AIM provides a comprehensive set of metrics to determine whether an intervention is 'worth it' from both scientific and practical perspectives. It has become the standard framework for evaluating implementation success across health domains. | Normalization Process Theory (NPT) is a sociological framework developed by Carl May and colleagues to explain how new interventions become routinely embedded ('normalized') in organizational and clinical practice. Unlike efficiency-focused frameworks that measure adoption and fidelity, NPT explains the social processes through which interventions transition from external innovations to normal practice. NPT identifies four key mechanisms (Coherence, Cognitive Participation, Collective Action, Reflexive Monitoring) that collectively determine whether an intervention becomes 'the way we do things here' or remains a temporary project. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|