ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Các tiêu chí về độ tin cậy trong nghiên cứu định tính×Tính phản tư trong Nghiên cứu Định tính×
Lĩnh vựcNghiên cứu định tínhNghiên cứu định tính
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời19851990
Người khởi xướngYvonna Lincoln and Egon GubaAnthony Giddens and Pierre Bourdieu
LoạiFrameworkConcept
Công trình gốcLincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314Finlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545. DOI ↗
Tên gọi kháctrustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmabilityreflexive practice, researcher reflexivity, positionality, reflective practice
Liên quan44
Tóm tắtTrustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies.Reflexivity is the practice of examining how the researcher's identity, assumptions, relationships, and values influence the research process and findings. Rather than treating objectivity as achievable detachment, reflexivity acknowledges that the researcher is embedded within the research and cannot be fully separated from it. Originating in sociology and anthropology, reflexivity has become central to qualitative research rigor across disciplines. Reflexive researchers critically examine their own influence at each stage: research design, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation, and presentation. This transparency strengthens rigor by making visible the lens through which data are collected and interpreted.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 4 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research · Reflexivity in Qualitative Research. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare