So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Program Budgeting (PPBS)× | Public Value Measurement× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Public Administration | Public Administration |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1965 | 1995 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | David Novick & RAND Corporation; Allen Schick | Mark H. Moore |
| Loại≠ | Budgeting and planning system | Strategic public management framework |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Schick, A. (1966). The Road to PPB: The Stages of Budget Reform. Public Administration Review, 26(4), 243–258. DOI ↗ | Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN: 9780674175587 |
| Tên gọi khác | PPBS, Planning-Programming-Budgeting System, Program Budgeting, Programme Budgeting | Public Value Assessment, Public Value Accounting, Strategic Triangle Analysis, Public Value Scorecard |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Program budgeting, formalised as the Planning-Programming-Budgeting System (PPBS), structures the budget around the government's objectives and the programs that serve them rather than around organisational units or input line items. It couples that program structure with systematic analysis of alternative ways to achieve each objective, multi-year cost projections, and cost-effectiveness comparison. Developed at the RAND Corporation and set out in David Novick's 1965 edited volume, it was adopted across the U.S. federal government under Defense Secretary Robert McNamara and President Johnson. Allen Schick's 1966 essay 'The Road to PPB' placed it as the culmination of budgeting's evolution toward a planning orientation. | Public value measurement assesses the worth that government action creates for citizens and society, going beyond financial efficiency or narrow output counts to capture outcomes, equity, trust and the quality of public life. It is grounded in Mark Moore's 1995 framework Creating Public Value, which argues that public managers should pursue value much as private managers pursue shareholder value, but judged against a 'strategic triangle' of substantive value, political legitimacy and support, and operational capacity. Measuring public value therefore means evidencing all three corners — what was achieved, whether it commands authorising support, and whether the organisation can deliver it — rather than any single bottom line. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|