ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Tạp chí và Nhà xuất bản Săn mồi×Các mô hình xuất bản truy cập mở×
Lĩnh vựcĐạo đức xuất bảnĐạo đức xuất bản
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời20102002
Người khởi xướngJeffrey Beall (University of Colorado Denver); international research communityBudapest Open Access Initiative (2002); open science movement
LoạiFrameworkStandard
Công trình gốcBeall, J. (2010). Predatory Open-Access Scholarly Publishers. The Charleston Advisor, 11(4), 10–17. link ↗Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002, revised 2012). Budapest Open Access Initiative. link ↗
Tên gọi khácPredatory Publishing, Fake Journals, Pay-to-Publish SchemesOA Publishing, Gold Open Access, Green Open Access, Diamond OA
Liên quan44
Tóm tắtPredatory journals are fake academic publishers that exploit the open-access model by charging authors publication fees without providing peer review, editorial oversight, or quality control. Coined by librarian Jeffrey Beall in 2010, the term describes publishers that prioritize profit over scientific integrity, accepting nearly all submissions (regardless of quality), using deceptive marketing (claiming high impact factors, faking indexing, using names similar to established journals), and often hosting work that would not survive peer review. Publishing in predatory journals damages an author's credibility and wastes research dissemination efforts.Open access (OA) publishing removes subscription paywalls, making research freely available to all readers online without subscription fees. The Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002) defined OA as the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link research freely. Multiple OA models exist: Gold OA (immediate free access, often author-funded via APCs), Green OA (free self-archiving in repositories), and Diamond OA (free to both authors and readers). OA expands research impact, enables global participation in science, and aligns with public funding mandates. However, OA models vary in sustainability and are sometimes exploited by predatory publishers.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Predatory Journals and Publishers · Open Access Publishing Models. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare