ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Portfolio Assessment×Rubric Development×
Lĩnh vựcEducationEducation
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời19922007
Người khởi xướngPerformance-assessment tradition (Arter & Spandel; Koretz; Vermont/Kentucky programs)Performance-assessment tradition (Andrade; Arter & McTighe; Jonsson & Svingby synthesis)
LoạiAssessment based on a purposeful collection of student work over timeSystematic design of criterion-based scoring guides for performance
Công trình gốcArter, J. A., & Spandel, V. (1992). Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11(1), 36–44. DOI ↗Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácEducational Portfolio Assessment, Student Portfolio Evaluation, Showcase / Working Portfolio Assessment, Portfolio-Based AssessmentScoring Rubric Design, Analytic and Holistic Rubrics, Performance Scoring Guides, Rubric Construction
Liên quan44
Tóm tắtPortfolio assessment evaluates learning through a purposeful collection of a student's work assembled over time rather than through a single test. The portfolio may showcase best work, document growth, or demonstrate mastery against standards, and typically includes student selection and reflection. Articulated for education by Arter and Spandel and stress-tested in large-scale programs analyzed by Koretz, it captures authentic, complex performance that on-demand testing misses, while raising distinctive challenges for the reliability and comparability of scores.Rubric development is the systematic design of criterion-referenced scoring guides for judging complex performance such as writing, projects, presentations, and problem solving. A rubric specifies the dimensions on which work is evaluated and describes, in ordered levels, what each degree of quality looks like. Done well — as the syntheses by Andrade and by Jonsson and Svingby show — rubrics make scoring more reliable and transparent, clarify expectations for students, and turn assessment into a tool for learning rather than merely a verdict.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Portfolio Assessment · Rubric Development. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-25 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare