ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Đối chiếu điểm xu hướng để đánh giá chính sách×Ước lượng Mạnh mẽ Kép (AIPW)×
Lĩnh vựcSuy luận nhân quảSuy luận nhân quả
HọRegression modelRegression model
Năm ra đời1983; policy evaluation adaptation 19972005
Người khởi xướngRosenbaum & Rubin (1983); Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1997) for program/policy evaluation applicationRobins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins
LoạiQuasi-experimental matching estimatorSemiparametric causal estimator
Công trình gốcRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácPSM policy evaluation, policy PSM, propensity matching for program evaluation, PSM treatment evaluationAIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)
Liên quan65
Tóm tắtPolicy evaluation propensity score matching applies the propensity score framework — originally developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and operationalized for program evaluation by Heckman et al. (1997) — to estimate the causal effect of a policy intervention. It constructs a credible comparison group from non-participants by matching them to participants on their estimated probability of receiving the treatment, enabling unbiased effect estimation without random assignment.Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Policy Evaluation Propensity Score Matching · Doubly Robust Estimation. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare