So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Ước lượng Khớp Đánh giá Chính sách× | Ghép Chính xác Tinh chỉnh (CEM)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Suy luận nhân quả | Suy luận nhân quả |
| Họ | Regression model | Regression model |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1998-2006 | 2011-2012 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Heckman, Ichimura & Todd; Abadie & Imbens | Iacus, King, & Porro |
| Loại≠ | Non-parametric causal estimator | Matching / causal inference |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235-267. DOI ↗ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | matching estimator, program evaluation matching, treatment effect matching, Abadie-Imbens estimator | CEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The policy evaluation matching estimator estimates the causal effect of a program or policy on treated units by pairing each participant with one or more non-participants who share similar pre-treatment characteristics. Developed rigorously by Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1998) and Abadie & Imbens (2006), it avoids parametric outcome models and is the standard non-parametric tool for program and policy evaluation. | Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|