So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Participant Observation× | Các tiêu chí về độ tin cậy trong nghiên cứu định tính× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Nghiên cứu định tính | Nghiên cứu định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1922 | 1985 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Bronislaw Malinowski | Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba |
| Loại≠ | Method | Framework |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books. ISBN: 978-0465026432 | Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314 |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | ethnographic observation, participatory observation, overt observation, immersive observation | trustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmability |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Participant observation is a qualitative research method in which the researcher embeds themselves within a community, organization, or social setting for an extended period, engaging in the activities and relationships of the group while systematically observing and documenting behavior, interactions, and cultural meaning. Pioneered by Malinowski in the 1920s and developed in anthropology, the method has been adopted across sociology, education, health sciences, and organizational research. The researcher functions as both insider (participating in group activities) and outsider (maintaining analytical distance), generating thick description—rich accounts of context, behavior, and meaning that reveal how people actually live and interact. | Trustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|