ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Lấy mẫu có trọng số trực tuyến×Trọng số điểm xu hướng (PSW / IPW)×
Lĩnh vựcPhương pháp luận khảo sátSuy luận nhân quả
HọProcess / pipelineRegression model
Năm ra đờiLate 1990s–2000s1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Người khởi xướngSurvey methodology practitioners; systematized via probability-based online panels (e.g., Knowledge Networks, founded late 1990s)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
LoạiProbability-adjusted online sampling techniqueCausal inference / reweighting
Công trình gốcDillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-1118456149Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácweb-based weighted sampling, internet survey weighting, online panel weighting, weighted internet samplingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Liên quan46
Tóm tắtOnline weighted sampling is the practice of recruiting respondents via internet platforms and then applying statistical weights to correct for unequal selection probabilities, coverage gaps, and differential non-response. It enables researchers to draw valid population inferences from web surveys by compensating for the structural biases inherent in online recruitment — including the fact that not all members of a target population have equal internet access or equal likelihood of joining a panel.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Online Weighted Sampling · Propensity Score Weighting. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare