So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích Meta Mạng× | Hồi quy siêu phân tích× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Tổng hợp bằng chứng | Phân tích tổng hợp |
| Họ≠ | Process / pipeline | Regression model |
| Năm ra đời | 2002 | 2002 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Lumley (2002) | Simon Thompson & Julian Higgins |
| Loại≠ | Method | Weighted regression for effect-size heterogeneity |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Lumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗ | Thompson, S. G., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2002). How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1559–1573. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | Mixed Treatment Comparison, MTC, Indirect Comparison Meta-Analysis | Meta-Analytic Regression, Weighted Regression in Meta-Analysis, Moderator Analysis, Meta-regresyon |
| Liên quan≠ | 1 | 2 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a systematic method for comparing multiple interventions simultaneously within a single analytical framework, incorporating both direct evidence (head-to-head trials) and indirect evidence (comparisons via common comparators). First formalized by Lumley in 2002, NMA allows researchers to rank treatments and quantify comparative effectiveness even when some treatment pairs have never been directly studied. | Meta-regression is a statistical technique that extends conventional meta-analysis by regressing study-level effect sizes on one or more study characteristics (moderators) to explain between-study heterogeneity. Formalized by Thompson and Higgins in 2002, it uses weighted least squares — weighting each study by the inverse of its variance — within a mixed-effects framework, allowing researchers to identify which study features systematically account for variation in observed effects across the literature. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|