So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích ẩn dụ dựa trên nhiều trường hợp× | Thematic Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Định tính | Nghiên cứu định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1980s–2000s (synthesis emerged in qualitative case research) | 2006 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Building on Lakoff & Johnson (1980) conceptual metaphor theory and Yin's multiple-case logic | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative comparative design | Method |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | cross-case metaphor analysis, comparative metaphor analysis, multi-case metaphor study, MCBMA | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multiple case-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative comparative method that systematically identifies and interprets metaphorical language across two or more bounded cases — such as schools, organisations, or participant groups — to reveal how people in different contexts conceptualise a shared phenomenon. It integrates Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory with Yin's multiple-case logic, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case breadth. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|