So sánh phương pháp

	Tự nghiệm pháp học thuật dựa trên nhiều trường hợp	Tự thuật dân tộc học
Lĩnh vực	Định tính	Định tính
Họ	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Năm ra đời	2000s–2010s	Late 20th century (term coined 1979; method consolidated 1990s–2000s)
Người khởi xướng	Heewon Chang, Faith Ngunjiri, Kathy-Ann Hernandez (collaborative autoethnography); broader tradition from Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner	Carolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner, Norman Denzin (prominent theorists); David Hayano coined the term in 1979
Loại	Qualitative research design variant	Qualitative research method
Công trình gốc	Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K. A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1611321104	Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759100947
Tên gọi khác	collective autoethnography, multi-case autoethnography, collaborative autoethnography, multi-site autoethnography	auto-ethnography, AE, personal narrative research, self-ethnography
Liên quan	4	6
Tóm tắt	Multiple case-based autoethnography is a qualitative design that extends autoethnographic inquiry across two or more researcher-participants or cases, enabling systematic comparison of personal lived experiences within a shared cultural or social phenomenon. By generating rich first-person narratives from each case and then conducting a structured cross-case analysis, the approach combines the depth and reflexivity of autoethnography with the comparative analytical power of multiple case design.	Autoethnography is a qualitative research method in which the researcher uses systematic self-reflection and personal narrative to examine their own experiences within a cultural, social, or organizational context. By treating the self as both subject and instrument, autoethnography connects individual lived experience to broader cultural patterns, making personal stories analytically and socially significant. It bridges autobiography and ethnography, producing accounts that are simultaneously evocative and scholarly.